Q. What does it take to become leader of the "Free World?"
A. 100 million dollars.
I would say that kind of levels the playing field, wouldn't you?
Without that kind of money -- mere pocket change for most of us -- the media will ignore your campaign in search of political dialogue (I use that term very lightly) more profitable to their bottom line.
And one more layer of deception in the sham of modern democracy falls asunder ...
But, for more on exactly what it takes to become President of the United States, we have to all the way back 20 years for a Washington Times story (published on 6 July 1988) that is perhaps more relevant today than it was then. It reads, in part:
Bush Related to Europe's Royal Blood
"Vice-President George Bush is a distant cousin of Queen Elizabeth II and has blood ties with every other European royal family on or off the throne, according to the publishing director of a blueblood directory ... Harold Brooks-Baker, an American who has made a name for himself analyzing royal lineages, especially where they link up with the White House.
"Without a shadow of a doubt, Vice-President George Bush is connected to more imperial, royal, and noble houses than any previous president."
This week [Mr. Brooks-Baker] released a copy of Mr. Bush's family tree traced by his directory, Burke's Peerage, back to the 1400's. It says that Mr. Bush is a long-lost relative -- 13th cousin twice removed -- of Britain's current monarch, and is a direct descendant of King Henry VII, of one of Charles II's mistresses and of Henry VIII's younger sister, Mary, who married King Louis XII of France ...
Mr. Brook Baker said that while very few Americans are descendants of European monarchy, "An unbelievably high proportion of American presidents are connected to the 'Blood Royal."
Mr. Bush is without doubt connected to more great royal families than any reigning head of state today except His Serene Highness Prince Franz Josef of Liechtenstein. The vice-president also is related to 21 of Britain's 26 dukes, he said."
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Lyle Longclaws
"... before the healing can take place, the poison must first be exposed."
Lyle Longclaws
Lyle Longclaws
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Five Foundations of Human Development
Five Foundations of Human Development
Errol A. Gibbs and Philip A. Grey
Published by AuthorHouse
595 pages
Price?
Five Foundations of Human Development (FFHD) is an ambitous project -- eleven years in the making -- that, in the words of the authors, "offers hope for the survival of humanity in the 21st century and the new millennium."
Scientific Ecclesiastes
Shall we begin with Ecclesiastes? I think so.
The author of the Book of Ecclesiastes, identified as “the Philosopher”, evinces the spirit of modern day scientific inquiry when he declares in Chapter 1 verse 12, "I determined that I would examine and study all the things that are done in this world."
Perhaps not so characteristic of the modern age -- at least not of academicians that govern scientific dialogue from their (proverbial) ivory towers -- "the Philosopher" presents us with the conclusion of his study in verses 17-18,"But I found out that I might as well be chasing the wind. The wiser you are, the more worries you have; the more you know, the more it hurts."
Gibbs and Grey, authors of FFHD, interpret the Philosopher's conclusion as demonstrating "the intrinsic links between advancements in material knowledge and the Spiritual decline of nations." And further, "The fall of the great empires of the ancient world is a testament to this correlation, and an illustration of the futility of a society that abandons God's plan for human survival."
This interpretation provides an undercurrent to many of the thoughts and ideas in the book, and appears to be a primary motivation for Gibbs and Grey's entire oeuvre. Follow me.
Spirituality
The first and primary theme of the book deals with that collective side of ourselves, most conspicuous in so-called primitive societies, that celebrates our spiritual nature as the central and organizing principle of our societies. It is within these very societies, and under the leadership of ”spiritual man”, that the Abrahamic religions -- Judaism, Christianity, and Islam -- were founded.
Yet, in our modern or "advanced" age, humanity awakens, with each new generation, to find itself adrift on the vast ocean of existence, and under the captaincy of an entirely new creature, “scientific man”, if you will, or “materialistic man”-- that side of ourselves that places material knowledge as society's highest value.
Gibbs and Grey make the point that this chameleon-like transformation leaves humanity feeling cut off at the "source" and the authors' fivefold path to human development is an attempt to return to a more spiritual age, where former chief protagonist, the spiritual person, is allowed once again to take the lead on the world's stage. The result just might be that humanity would come full circle, as it were, with our collective eyes more open, and better for the experience. I am reminded here of a literary allusion to this possibility in a few of the sunset lines of T.S. Eliot's Fourth Quartet, Little Gidding,
"We shall not cease from exploration,
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time."
Morality
The second theme of the book, the disparity of material wealth among nations, the author's attribute to the "accumulation of superfluous wealth" among nations of the West. This theme is related to the second foundation of FFHD, namely morality -- just as the first theme is related to the first foundation, namely spirituality (more on the foundations proper later).
At the very heart of the book, pp. 273-5, we find what is perhaps its thematic climax. The responsibility to attain a more equitable distribution of wealth, say the authors, is essentially a spiritual one and "flows from the heart."
Here, the authors marry the themes of spirituality and morality by saying that the way our spirituality is realized in this material world is via ethical/moral behavior or, alternatively, the recognition of our spiritual nature is what leads us to behave morally in this material world of God's creation. This link at the heart of the book between the two major themes, is, in the opinion of this reader, almost ethereal in its brilliance. Brilliant for reasons not the least of which is that it affords the opportunity for everyone in our society to be a leader.
The authors point out that this universal law of human experience is summed up in the equally universal moral code of all the major world religions; namely "Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets." Matthew 7:12
The spiritual essence of this universal moral code is that it places people above material wants and desires and begs the rhetorical question, "What kind of 'heaven' (i.e., what a wonderful spiritual experience) life in this world could be if people were as important, or more important, than money."
Fuller Disclosure
It is, no doubt, the many years of experience -- both as humans and Christians (not that these are mutually exclusive!) -- under the authors' collective belts that allow them to speak so authoritatively not only on fundamental issues surrounding their faith, but on other topics they have tackled in the book, topics as diverse as education and technology, economics and health.
Canute B. Blake, in his foreword to the book, says "Grey and Gibbs have combined world travel experience in various countries within North and South America, Europe, Asia, the Caribbean and Africa." The authors, however, and perhaps disappointingly for the reader, have chosen to keep their experiences to themselves! The book, therefore, lacks the very persuasive influence of the human voice. The writing comes across as mildly dogmatic, monotone, bathed in a certain prosaic abstraction that "drowns out" the authors' very inspiring themes.
The authors may have knowingly sacrificed a more personal perspective for the 'foundational' one they were trying to achieve, but, in the opinion of this reader, the sacrifice was not necessary. The religious experience is, after all, one of the most personal of all experiences.
Nevertheless, we find the following lines written on page 95. After explaining how "Love begins with God", the authors assert "We will know that God's love is working in us and through us when we voluntarily enter the great battlefield of races and cultures, and champion the poor, the aged, the hungry, the dispossessed and the disenfranchised. It is only within these environments that God's incomprehensible love manifests its greatest patience with us, and we see its capacity to transform human lives, to overcome fear and to inspire care and compassion."
Here we find the evidence of the authors' own rich experiences, on which these lines are so plainly based, poking it's head through their restrictive writing style. The reader is left itching for a more direct disclosure of the authors' experiences emanating from the love of the God of Abraham and their resultant love for the "dispossessed" of humanity.
The Foundations
To the foundations themselves, then, shall we?
The major two foundations of "human development," as the authors call it, are spiritual and moral, in that order. Next are the social, intellectual and physical, in that order. About one sixth of the book (a hundred pages or so) is devoted to each of these five foundations.
In the section on spirituality, the authors, in keeping with their message of hope, discuss the characteristics of a society which is deeply rooted in the spiritual foundation. These characteristics include love, faith, hope, charity, peace, all of which -- if the 6:00 pm news are any indication -- seem like stations the "human train" has long since left, perhaps never to return.
In the moral foundation, distinction is made between "leadership" and "authority." The authors make the case that genuine leadership -- spiritual and moral -- has become but a flickering candle amidst the glaring and intrusive "spotlights" of societies' myriad "authority figures."
The vast territory of the book's subject matter is demarcated by a seemingly endless supply of biblical quotes, which typically sit with epigrammatic brilliance at the top of each chapter. These quotes echo the wisdom of the Bible and provide a flavor or sub-theme for each of the chapters in the book. For example, in discussing the nature and types of human relationships -- the first part of the social foundation -- the authors provide a biblical overture to the chapter from Romans 12:15-16. "Rejoice with those who rejoice; mourn with those who mourn. Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited."
The author's round out their discussion of the social foundation with a biblically based discussion of the nature and causes of racism; a prescriptive analysis of human behavior, emphasizing the biblical legacy of King Solomon, i.e. the Book of Proverbs; and an analysis of the social causes and consequences of low self esteem.
The authors open the intellectual foundation with a 'theological' distinction between education and intelligence. Education , say the authors, is "the sole prerogative of human beings," while intelligence is rooted in our spiritual nature and therefore "begins with God." In the third chapter the authors analyze "knowledge" introduced by another biblical quote, this time fom Proverbs 9:10, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding." In this chapter, the authors dwell on their view that, despite the information explosion in our society, "The full storehouse of human knowledge over the past centuries is infinitesimal in comparison to ... God's storehouse of His Spiritual knowledge."
The final chapter of the intellectual foundation dwells on humankind's ability, or lack thereof, to guide the course of its own destiny. If time is a river, as it has often been likened to, then, by all accounts, the history of humanity has been one of it's most tortuous estuaries. Human history can be defined as the very biography of human conflict, as though conflict itself were a species in its own right, complete with its own cultural, technological and political evolution. Who will be humanity's most capable guide? The authors find their answer in "God and his Son Jesus Christ," quoting from Proverbs 48:14 "For this is God, Our God forever and ever; He will be our guide Even to death."
The authors open the physical foundation with a discussion of human health where they emphasize a botanical rather than a synthetic approach to pharmacology as an essential element in the medical paradigm. One of them (though they do not mention who) has recently been on the receiving end of a "catastrophic diagnosis." Appropriately, the second chapter (of three) in the physical foundation is named, "catastrophic diseases," which is principally an epidemiological inquiry into the major causes of death in developed nations, i.e. heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. The final chapter of the physical foundation extols the benefits of physical activity, in part through a collection of the writings of a variety of society's health "authorities."
Conclusion
The authors stress the book is for everyone, "... it has a message that everyone can read, and everyone can benefit from." Canute B. Blake, however, says "The book … offers individuals in positions of leadership, both in private and public sectors, unique philosophical, religious and practical approaches from which to examine and solve the complex human problems of our modern world." FFHD, therefore, can be seen as a paradigm of sorts, based on a hierarchical value system, and through which, it is proposed, leaders can tackle humanities myriad hang-ups, draw-downs, and other species-threatening problems.
As my eyes swept past the above lines from Blake ("The book ... offers individuals ...") however, a random thought surfaced in my mind: "Politics is too important an issue to be left to the politicians." And in the days that ensued, similar thoughts arose, "Medicine is far too important an issue to be left to pharmaceutically-trained doctors!" and "Scholarship in general is far too important an issue to be left to the scholars!" I envision a much more democratic system of knowledge in our society, rather than the hierarchical-based knowledge system we currently have. Knowledge is power, after all, and power must be distributed evenly. I propose, therefore, that Gibbs and Grey's work should be targeted to the same grass roots communities from which it was evidently born, and not to the halls of power or of establishment academia.
True to the authors' objective in writing the book, FFHD inspired this reader, at least, with hope and faith in the realization that there are still some among us whose actions are based on conviction not currency. Pick up your copy, and be inspired.
Errol A. Gibbs and Philip A. Grey
Published by AuthorHouse
595 pages
Price?
Five Foundations of Human Development (FFHD) is an ambitous project -- eleven years in the making -- that, in the words of the authors, "offers hope for the survival of humanity in the 21st century and the new millennium."
Scientific Ecclesiastes
Shall we begin with Ecclesiastes? I think so.
The author of the Book of Ecclesiastes, identified as “the Philosopher”, evinces the spirit of modern day scientific inquiry when he declares in Chapter 1 verse 12, "I determined that I would examine and study all the things that are done in this world."
Perhaps not so characteristic of the modern age -- at least not of academicians that govern scientific dialogue from their (proverbial) ivory towers -- "the Philosopher" presents us with the conclusion of his study in verses 17-18,"But I found out that I might as well be chasing the wind. The wiser you are, the more worries you have; the more you know, the more it hurts."
Gibbs and Grey, authors of FFHD, interpret the Philosopher's conclusion as demonstrating "the intrinsic links between advancements in material knowledge and the Spiritual decline of nations." And further, "The fall of the great empires of the ancient world is a testament to this correlation, and an illustration of the futility of a society that abandons God's plan for human survival."
This interpretation provides an undercurrent to many of the thoughts and ideas in the book, and appears to be a primary motivation for Gibbs and Grey's entire oeuvre. Follow me.
Spirituality
The first and primary theme of the book deals with that collective side of ourselves, most conspicuous in so-called primitive societies, that celebrates our spiritual nature as the central and organizing principle of our societies. It is within these very societies, and under the leadership of ”spiritual man”, that the Abrahamic religions -- Judaism, Christianity, and Islam -- were founded.
Yet, in our modern or "advanced" age, humanity awakens, with each new generation, to find itself adrift on the vast ocean of existence, and under the captaincy of an entirely new creature, “scientific man”, if you will, or “materialistic man”-- that side of ourselves that places material knowledge as society's highest value.
Gibbs and Grey make the point that this chameleon-like transformation leaves humanity feeling cut off at the "source" and the authors' fivefold path to human development is an attempt to return to a more spiritual age, where former chief protagonist, the spiritual person, is allowed once again to take the lead on the world's stage. The result just might be that humanity would come full circle, as it were, with our collective eyes more open, and better for the experience. I am reminded here of a literary allusion to this possibility in a few of the sunset lines of T.S. Eliot's Fourth Quartet, Little Gidding,
"We shall not cease from exploration,
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time."
Morality
The second theme of the book, the disparity of material wealth among nations, the author's attribute to the "accumulation of superfluous wealth" among nations of the West. This theme is related to the second foundation of FFHD, namely morality -- just as the first theme is related to the first foundation, namely spirituality (more on the foundations proper later).
At the very heart of the book, pp. 273-5, we find what is perhaps its thematic climax. The responsibility to attain a more equitable distribution of wealth, say the authors, is essentially a spiritual one and "flows from the heart."
Here, the authors marry the themes of spirituality and morality by saying that the way our spirituality is realized in this material world is via ethical/moral behavior or, alternatively, the recognition of our spiritual nature is what leads us to behave morally in this material world of God's creation. This link at the heart of the book between the two major themes, is, in the opinion of this reader, almost ethereal in its brilliance. Brilliant for reasons not the least of which is that it affords the opportunity for everyone in our society to be a leader.
The authors point out that this universal law of human experience is summed up in the equally universal moral code of all the major world religions; namely "Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets." Matthew 7:12
The spiritual essence of this universal moral code is that it places people above material wants and desires and begs the rhetorical question, "What kind of 'heaven' (i.e., what a wonderful spiritual experience) life in this world could be if people were as important, or more important, than money."
Fuller Disclosure
It is, no doubt, the many years of experience -- both as humans and Christians (not that these are mutually exclusive!) -- under the authors' collective belts that allow them to speak so authoritatively not only on fundamental issues surrounding their faith, but on other topics they have tackled in the book, topics as diverse as education and technology, economics and health.
Canute B. Blake, in his foreword to the book, says "Grey and Gibbs have combined world travel experience in various countries within North and South America, Europe, Asia, the Caribbean and Africa." The authors, however, and perhaps disappointingly for the reader, have chosen to keep their experiences to themselves! The book, therefore, lacks the very persuasive influence of the human voice. The writing comes across as mildly dogmatic, monotone, bathed in a certain prosaic abstraction that "drowns out" the authors' very inspiring themes.
The authors may have knowingly sacrificed a more personal perspective for the 'foundational' one they were trying to achieve, but, in the opinion of this reader, the sacrifice was not necessary. The religious experience is, after all, one of the most personal of all experiences.
Nevertheless, we find the following lines written on page 95. After explaining how "Love begins with God", the authors assert "We will know that God's love is working in us and through us when we voluntarily enter the great battlefield of races and cultures, and champion the poor, the aged, the hungry, the dispossessed and the disenfranchised. It is only within these environments that God's incomprehensible love manifests its greatest patience with us, and we see its capacity to transform human lives, to overcome fear and to inspire care and compassion."
Here we find the evidence of the authors' own rich experiences, on which these lines are so plainly based, poking it's head through their restrictive writing style. The reader is left itching for a more direct disclosure of the authors' experiences emanating from the love of the God of Abraham and their resultant love for the "dispossessed" of humanity.
The Foundations
To the foundations themselves, then, shall we?
The major two foundations of "human development," as the authors call it, are spiritual and moral, in that order. Next are the social, intellectual and physical, in that order. About one sixth of the book (a hundred pages or so) is devoted to each of these five foundations.
In the section on spirituality, the authors, in keeping with their message of hope, discuss the characteristics of a society which is deeply rooted in the spiritual foundation. These characteristics include love, faith, hope, charity, peace, all of which -- if the 6:00 pm news are any indication -- seem like stations the "human train" has long since left, perhaps never to return.
In the moral foundation, distinction is made between "leadership" and "authority." The authors make the case that genuine leadership -- spiritual and moral -- has become but a flickering candle amidst the glaring and intrusive "spotlights" of societies' myriad "authority figures."
The vast territory of the book's subject matter is demarcated by a seemingly endless supply of biblical quotes, which typically sit with epigrammatic brilliance at the top of each chapter. These quotes echo the wisdom of the Bible and provide a flavor or sub-theme for each of the chapters in the book. For example, in discussing the nature and types of human relationships -- the first part of the social foundation -- the authors provide a biblical overture to the chapter from Romans 12:15-16. "Rejoice with those who rejoice; mourn with those who mourn. Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited."
The author's round out their discussion of the social foundation with a biblically based discussion of the nature and causes of racism; a prescriptive analysis of human behavior, emphasizing the biblical legacy of King Solomon, i.e. the Book of Proverbs; and an analysis of the social causes and consequences of low self esteem.
The authors open the intellectual foundation with a 'theological' distinction between education and intelligence. Education , say the authors, is "the sole prerogative of human beings," while intelligence is rooted in our spiritual nature and therefore "begins with God." In the third chapter the authors analyze "knowledge" introduced by another biblical quote, this time fom Proverbs 9:10, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding." In this chapter, the authors dwell on their view that, despite the information explosion in our society, "The full storehouse of human knowledge over the past centuries is infinitesimal in comparison to ... God's storehouse of His Spiritual knowledge."
The final chapter of the intellectual foundation dwells on humankind's ability, or lack thereof, to guide the course of its own destiny. If time is a river, as it has often been likened to, then, by all accounts, the history of humanity has been one of it's most tortuous estuaries. Human history can be defined as the very biography of human conflict, as though conflict itself were a species in its own right, complete with its own cultural, technological and political evolution. Who will be humanity's most capable guide? The authors find their answer in "God and his Son Jesus Christ," quoting from Proverbs 48:14 "For this is God, Our God forever and ever; He will be our guide Even to death."
The authors open the physical foundation with a discussion of human health where they emphasize a botanical rather than a synthetic approach to pharmacology as an essential element in the medical paradigm. One of them (though they do not mention who) has recently been on the receiving end of a "catastrophic diagnosis." Appropriately, the second chapter (of three) in the physical foundation is named, "catastrophic diseases," which is principally an epidemiological inquiry into the major causes of death in developed nations, i.e. heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. The final chapter of the physical foundation extols the benefits of physical activity, in part through a collection of the writings of a variety of society's health "authorities."
Conclusion
The authors stress the book is for everyone, "... it has a message that everyone can read, and everyone can benefit from." Canute B. Blake, however, says "The book … offers individuals in positions of leadership, both in private and public sectors, unique philosophical, religious and practical approaches from which to examine and solve the complex human problems of our modern world." FFHD, therefore, can be seen as a paradigm of sorts, based on a hierarchical value system, and through which, it is proposed, leaders can tackle humanities myriad hang-ups, draw-downs, and other species-threatening problems.
As my eyes swept past the above lines from Blake ("The book ... offers individuals ...") however, a random thought surfaced in my mind: "Politics is too important an issue to be left to the politicians." And in the days that ensued, similar thoughts arose, "Medicine is far too important an issue to be left to pharmaceutically-trained doctors!" and "Scholarship in general is far too important an issue to be left to the scholars!" I envision a much more democratic system of knowledge in our society, rather than the hierarchical-based knowledge system we currently have. Knowledge is power, after all, and power must be distributed evenly. I propose, therefore, that Gibbs and Grey's work should be targeted to the same grass roots communities from which it was evidently born, and not to the halls of power or of establishment academia.
True to the authors' objective in writing the book, FFHD inspired this reader, at least, with hope and faith in the realization that there are still some among us whose actions are based on conviction not currency. Pick up your copy, and be inspired.
Old Drug + New Disease = New Patent
Old Drug + New Disease = New Patent
There is an unsavory though well-established pattern of behavior among the big drug companies (collectively referred to as Big Pharma) to seek out criteria for “new diseases” in order to find new markets for drugs which have lost their original markets or whose exclusive patents are about to expire.
As an example, the drug manufacturer Eli Lilly was about to lose their exclusive patent of Prozac, the anti-depressant drug that is known to, in fact, aggravate depressive symptoms by increasing the likelihood of suicide in patients taking the drug. The end of Ely Lilly’s exclusive patent meant that other drug companies would be allowed to sell generic Prozac for a fraction of the cost. How did Ely Lilly deal with this threat to their most lucrative product (2 billion dollars per year)?
Easy, they 1) changed the name of the pill, and 2) marketed it to a new demographic – women suffering from premenstrual symptoms 3) invented a new condition called PMDD (premenstrual dysphoric disorder) – completely unrelated to the more common disorder PMS (wink, wink).
The “new” drug, “Sarafem,” thus became the only drug on the market approved to treat a brand new condition called “PMDD” (premenstrual dysphoric disorder). Ely Lilly changed the color of the pill from green in the case of Prozac, to pink in the case of “Sarafem.”
Armed with a new disease, a new color for their drug, Ely Lilly was able to obtain a new patent for a very old drug. As such, they are now the only drug company allowed to treat this new condition. “A lot of women would really be outraged” said Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, in a documentary called ‘Big Bucks, Big Pharma’ “if they knew that they were just taking good old Prozac, same dose, but priced over three times as much as generic Prozac.”
The suppressed documentary “Big Bucks, Big Pharma,” reveals this and other drugs that have undergone similar “transformations” for the sake of renewing expiring patents of drugs that contribute billions to drug companies’ bottom line.
New diseases represent entirely new markets, and as the above example illustrates, drug companies don’t hesitate to turn their operating strategy on its head: from creating new drugs for old diseases to creating new diseases for old drugs.
“Every marketers dream is to find an unidentified or unknown market and develop it. That’s what we were able to do with Social Anxiety Disorder.” Admitted Paxil (another anti-depressant) product director Barry Brand. The alphabet networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, CTV …) were more than happy to promote the “S.A.D.”: e.g. NBC’s Good Morning America aired a “special two-part series” to market this new illness.
“Experts” also often change the parameters of health resulting in tremendous boosts to Big Pharma’s profits. "All you have to do is change the definition of high blood pressure,” said Marcia Angell, “and you can increase that market by tens of millions of people. Or change the definition of high cholesterol."
Once again, the mainstream alphabet networks are happy to comply. The following are actual quotes from “news reports”: "Your blood pressure may have gone from normal to high over night. New government guidelines mean millions need a checkup. Do you?" "If you didn't have a cholesterol problem yesterday, you may have one now." "The new guidelines call for a huge boost in cholesterol lowering drugs known as statins." "The new numbers mean millions of Americans may be taking statin drugs for the rest of their lives."
Let’s hear it for the new numbers!
The same equation, Old Drug + New Disease = New Patent, exists in the history of the phenomonen I spoke of in last months issue of EU, namely that of HIV/AIDS.
From the beginning of the AIDS “outbreak” in 1981, AIDS was promoted in the public and the nascent AIDS industry itself as a “new disease.” In fact, as I spoke of in the article, it is actually a group of old diseases, like tuberculosis and pneumonia, with a new name.
Instead of coming out with a vaccine, and just as in the case of Prozac/Sarafem, where an old drug was made new again via the discovery of a new disease, drug companies found a new market, i.e. a “new disease,” for a very old drug, this time, AZT. Despite the perception molded by the media, AZT is not a new drug at all; it is a very old drug, which was originally designed to treat cancer, but was taken off the market because it was deemed too toxic to treat cancer or any other condition.
So, here we have the same equation: Old Drug + New Disease = New Patent. Here we have an otherwise defunct drug – with life-threatening side effects – that was able to be re-patented for tremendous profit thanks to a “new disease.”
Also, just as in the case of Prozac, which has been found to exacerbate depressive symptoms by increasing likelihood of suicide, AZT exacerbates the symptoms of the very disease it is said to treat. Yes, it causes the very illness it is supposed to treat.
“If you think about it, you put in a person – [who is ] making hundreds of thousands of new T cells every minute -- an inhibitor of DNA synthesis, because the virus needs DNA to be replicated. But, the virus is 10 kbps and the human DNA is 1 million kbps.
You’re shooting nuclear weapons at bunnies. Yes, you’ll probably knock out a few bunnies. But, the forest doesn’t look very good after your hunt is over.” Peter Duesberg, University of California at Berkeley. The forest, in this case, is the human body. It was precisely for this reason that AZT was taken off the market as being too toxic even for cancer patients: it had a nasty habit of killing the patient before killing the cancer.
There is an unsavory though well-established pattern of behavior among the big drug companies (collectively referred to as Big Pharma) to seek out criteria for “new diseases” in order to find new markets for drugs which have lost their original markets or whose exclusive patents are about to expire.
As an example, the drug manufacturer Eli Lilly was about to lose their exclusive patent of Prozac, the anti-depressant drug that is known to, in fact, aggravate depressive symptoms by increasing the likelihood of suicide in patients taking the drug. The end of Ely Lilly’s exclusive patent meant that other drug companies would be allowed to sell generic Prozac for a fraction of the cost. How did Ely Lilly deal with this threat to their most lucrative product (2 billion dollars per year)?
Easy, they 1) changed the name of the pill, and 2) marketed it to a new demographic – women suffering from premenstrual symptoms 3) invented a new condition called PMDD (premenstrual dysphoric disorder) – completely unrelated to the more common disorder PMS (wink, wink).
The “new” drug, “Sarafem,” thus became the only drug on the market approved to treat a brand new condition called “PMDD” (premenstrual dysphoric disorder). Ely Lilly changed the color of the pill from green in the case of Prozac, to pink in the case of “Sarafem.”
Armed with a new disease, a new color for their drug, Ely Lilly was able to obtain a new patent for a very old drug. As such, they are now the only drug company allowed to treat this new condition. “A lot of women would really be outraged” said Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, in a documentary called ‘Big Bucks, Big Pharma’ “if they knew that they were just taking good old Prozac, same dose, but priced over three times as much as generic Prozac.”
The suppressed documentary “Big Bucks, Big Pharma,” reveals this and other drugs that have undergone similar “transformations” for the sake of renewing expiring patents of drugs that contribute billions to drug companies’ bottom line.
New diseases represent entirely new markets, and as the above example illustrates, drug companies don’t hesitate to turn their operating strategy on its head: from creating new drugs for old diseases to creating new diseases for old drugs.
“Every marketers dream is to find an unidentified or unknown market and develop it. That’s what we were able to do with Social Anxiety Disorder.” Admitted Paxil (another anti-depressant) product director Barry Brand. The alphabet networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, CTV …) were more than happy to promote the “S.A.D.”: e.g. NBC’s Good Morning America aired a “special two-part series” to market this new illness.
“Experts” also often change the parameters of health resulting in tremendous boosts to Big Pharma’s profits. "All you have to do is change the definition of high blood pressure,” said Marcia Angell, “and you can increase that market by tens of millions of people. Or change the definition of high cholesterol."
Once again, the mainstream alphabet networks are happy to comply. The following are actual quotes from “news reports”: "Your blood pressure may have gone from normal to high over night. New government guidelines mean millions need a checkup. Do you?" "If you didn't have a cholesterol problem yesterday, you may have one now." "The new guidelines call for a huge boost in cholesterol lowering drugs known as statins." "The new numbers mean millions of Americans may be taking statin drugs for the rest of their lives."
Let’s hear it for the new numbers!
The same equation, Old Drug + New Disease = New Patent, exists in the history of the phenomonen I spoke of in last months issue of EU, namely that of HIV/AIDS.
From the beginning of the AIDS “outbreak” in 1981, AIDS was promoted in the public and the nascent AIDS industry itself as a “new disease.” In fact, as I spoke of in the article, it is actually a group of old diseases, like tuberculosis and pneumonia, with a new name.
Instead of coming out with a vaccine, and just as in the case of Prozac/Sarafem, where an old drug was made new again via the discovery of a new disease, drug companies found a new market, i.e. a “new disease,” for a very old drug, this time, AZT. Despite the perception molded by the media, AZT is not a new drug at all; it is a very old drug, which was originally designed to treat cancer, but was taken off the market because it was deemed too toxic to treat cancer or any other condition.
So, here we have the same equation: Old Drug + New Disease = New Patent. Here we have an otherwise defunct drug – with life-threatening side effects – that was able to be re-patented for tremendous profit thanks to a “new disease.”
Also, just as in the case of Prozac, which has been found to exacerbate depressive symptoms by increasing likelihood of suicide, AZT exacerbates the symptoms of the very disease it is said to treat. Yes, it causes the very illness it is supposed to treat.
“If you think about it, you put in a person – [who is ] making hundreds of thousands of new T cells every minute -- an inhibitor of DNA synthesis, because the virus needs DNA to be replicated. But, the virus is 10 kbps and the human DNA is 1 million kbps.
You’re shooting nuclear weapons at bunnies. Yes, you’ll probably knock out a few bunnies. But, the forest doesn’t look very good after your hunt is over.” Peter Duesberg, University of California at Berkeley. The forest, in this case, is the human body. It was precisely for this reason that AZT was taken off the market as being too toxic even for cancer patients: it had a nasty habit of killing the patient before killing the cancer.
Credo Mutwa and the History of Africa
“When the white men started destroying our religion; when he started demonizing our Gods; when he started ridiculing what we believed in, and actually using educated Africans to destroy that ancient African religion, in many parts of Africa, our ancient religion went underground. And there were, call them secret societies, all over Africa, south, east, west, north, where this knowledge was stored and kept by aging guardians, many of whom did not know that in other parts of the land there were other guardians who were doing exactly what they were doing.”
In this quote, Credo Mutwa, the last Zulu Shaman (also called Sanusi, or Sangoma) describes how he came to be initiated into the rites and ceremonies, the knowledge and wealth of information of authentic African history, culture, and civilization.
According to researcher David Icke, who has done much to give exposure to Credo Mutwa and his vast knowledge of authentic African history, there are only two Sangomas or Sanusis left in Africa. Credo Mutwa is one.
“[Credo] Mutwa is the official keeper of the history and knowledge of the Zulu people” says Icke. “The true version of history of the continent of Africa is dying. It’s being lost to the official nonsense we’re told is history.”
Winston Churchill said, “History is written by the victors.” That means the history of Africa was written by the white colonists.
In this quote, Credo Mutwa hints at the richness of the African civilizations decimated when the continent was colonized and pillaged of it’s wealth by the white European power elite – which continues to pillage Africa of all its wealth to this day:
“When I first became a Sangoma, I was already a person of education. I had entered school as a child of 14 years, and when I became a Sangoma, I was a youth of 16 years. What my aunt and my grandfather as well as my maternal grandmother told me shook me to the core of my soul.
“I found that the missionary schools had been teaching me lies about my people all along. Missionaries had told us as children that the only light came to Africa with the white people, that before the white men came we black people had no idea about God, we had no belief in a life after death and that our people were just a race of savages who used to lie around in the sun, womanize, fight, and drink beer everyday.
“I was suddenly awakened to the fact that Africans had been far greater intellectually than the missionaries were willing to give them credit for. That, like the white men, we had astrology, astronomy, we had surgery. In fact, I found that zulu surgeons in the early 19th century, the 18th century and even prior, could perform operations which white surgeons were not capable of performing.”
And the more I learned about my people, the more I wanted to learn. And when my initiation under my father and grandmother had ended, I wanted to learn more and more and more.”
“Our people need development, need peace, we are basically a peaceful people, we are not warlike. Don’t tell historians tell you a lot of rubbish. Africa is not perceived by people outside her as she really is. One, my people are Zulu’s – a tribe famous for warrior exploits for many years now. But wait, do you know sir that Zulu people actually hated war, and didn’t love it as historians [claim.]"
A continuation of this interview can be viewed on Google video (under "Reptilian Agenda") or by visiting David Icke's website, www.davidicke.com.
In this quote, Credo Mutwa, the last Zulu Shaman (also called Sanusi, or Sangoma) describes how he came to be initiated into the rites and ceremonies, the knowledge and wealth of information of authentic African history, culture, and civilization.
According to researcher David Icke, who has done much to give exposure to Credo Mutwa and his vast knowledge of authentic African history, there are only two Sangomas or Sanusis left in Africa. Credo Mutwa is one.
“[Credo] Mutwa is the official keeper of the history and knowledge of the Zulu people” says Icke. “The true version of history of the continent of Africa is dying. It’s being lost to the official nonsense we’re told is history.”
Winston Churchill said, “History is written by the victors.” That means the history of Africa was written by the white colonists.
In this quote, Credo Mutwa hints at the richness of the African civilizations decimated when the continent was colonized and pillaged of it’s wealth by the white European power elite – which continues to pillage Africa of all its wealth to this day:
“When I first became a Sangoma, I was already a person of education. I had entered school as a child of 14 years, and when I became a Sangoma, I was a youth of 16 years. What my aunt and my grandfather as well as my maternal grandmother told me shook me to the core of my soul.
“I found that the missionary schools had been teaching me lies about my people all along. Missionaries had told us as children that the only light came to Africa with the white people, that before the white men came we black people had no idea about God, we had no belief in a life after death and that our people were just a race of savages who used to lie around in the sun, womanize, fight, and drink beer everyday.
“I was suddenly awakened to the fact that Africans had been far greater intellectually than the missionaries were willing to give them credit for. That, like the white men, we had astrology, astronomy, we had surgery. In fact, I found that zulu surgeons in the early 19th century, the 18th century and even prior, could perform operations which white surgeons were not capable of performing.”
And the more I learned about my people, the more I wanted to learn. And when my initiation under my father and grandmother had ended, I wanted to learn more and more and more.”
“Our people need development, need peace, we are basically a peaceful people, we are not warlike. Don’t tell historians tell you a lot of rubbish. Africa is not perceived by people outside her as she really is. One, my people are Zulu’s – a tribe famous for warrior exploits for many years now. But wait, do you know sir that Zulu people actually hated war, and didn’t love it as historians [claim.]"
A continuation of this interview can be viewed on Google video (under "Reptilian Agenda") or by visiting David Icke's website, www.davidicke.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)